AFSCME Council 31 Director Roberta Lynch on Janus v. AFSCME: “Mr. Janus is somewhat misleading people”

John Williams

Danica Alink, of McLean, Va., center, and Beth Feeley, of Wilmette, Illi., right, say the Pledge of Allegiance at the start of a rally supporting Mark Janus, outside of the Supreme Court, Monday, Feb. 26, 2018, in Washington. The Supreme Court takes up a challenge in a case that could deal a painful financial blow to organized labor. The court is considering a challenge to an Illinois law that allows unions representing government employees to collect fees from workers who choose not to join.(AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

AFSCME Council 31 Executive Director Roberta Lynch responds to yesterday’s interview with union worker Mark Janus’s attorney on his Supreme Court case, Janus v. AFSCME 31. She argues why union fees are fair, including benefits and safety on the job.

[audio http://serve.castfire.com/audio/3472576/3472576_2018-02-27-160916.64kmono.mp3?ad_params=zones%3DPreroll%7Cstation_id%3D3759.mp3]

The Mincing Rascals

More The Mincing Rascals

The John Williams Show
Weekdays 9 a.m. - noon JohnWilliams

Focusing on current events, John discusses the news of the day, sports, television programs, movies, and books with a thoughtful perspective and quirky sense of humor. Inquisitive and curious by nature, he asks what listeners want to know and his guests never get a pass on the tough questions. (Click for more.)

The John Williams NewsClick sponsored by Joint Relief Institute

More NewsClick

Popular