AFSCME Council 31 Director Roberta Lynch on Janus v. AFSCME: “Mr. Janus is somewhat misleading people”

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Danica Alink, of McLean, Va., center, and Beth Feeley, of Wilmette, Illi., right, say the Pledge of Allegiance at the start of a rally supporting Mark Janus, outside of the Supreme Court, Monday, Feb. 26, 2018, in Washington. The Supreme Court takes up a challenge in a case that could deal a painful financial blow to organized labor. The court is considering a challenge to an Illinois law that allows unions representing government employees to collect fees from workers who choose not to join.(AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

AFSCME Council 31 Executive Director Roberta Lynch responds to yesterday’s interview with union worker Mark Janus’s attorney on his Supreme Court case, Janus v. AFSCME 31. She argues why union fees are fair, including benefits and safety on the job.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.