635515 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwgnradio.com%2F2013%2F01%2F24%2Ffired-for-smoking%2FFired+for+smoking%21%3F%212013-01-24+19%3A49%3A22wgnnewsclickhttp%3A%2F%2Fwgnradio.com%2F%3Fp%3D6355 to “Fired for smoking!?!”
Anonymous said:
January 24, 2013 at 2:39 PM
In my world I would say yes that employers should be allowed to fire somebody because they smoke! I can't stand the stench of cigarettes and cigars, etc. In this politically correct state-of-being that we are in, no, they should not be allowed to fire somebody because they smoke. Maybe full-time employment could be based on a short physical for possible insurance and then the employer could base their decision to hire on the outcome of that physical. As for part-time….I don't know…STOP SMOKING!
As long as it's still legal to buy and sell cigarettes, they should not be fired for being a smoker, while the employer can set limits to how often and where smokers go for a smoke break. Firing a smoker would be the same as firing a drinker. Yes it's best to be a none smoker, but thats in a perfect world.
I would hope to be given an opportunity to quit smoking first, but an employer should have the right to fire for any reason and keep your govt. out of it. If your competition hires the better talent, including smokers, you may suffer. The smokers should have the right to open a smokers only work force.
I'd say yes, especially if the employee in question smokes in the work place or close to it. Not everyone can stand even a whiff of tobacco. Still, Tom's right, fair warnings should still be given and maybe even a suggestion to try healthier and less disruptive alternatives.
I have a theme that is responsive but the content appears uneven within its page container so that it appears aligned left. I want to make sure that it is always centered no matter the screen size; and I was wondering if I could and how to convert it to being fixed or correct the issue.
Don't look upon this new hobby as a way to save yourself a lot of money, as writing your own version of most of the programs that you need to pay for now will be out of your reach.
Nice article Regis. I think that Faith is similar to Hope. I'm testing Hope right now, so this article really help me pass through this.
v2 cigs electronic cigarette
As long as it's still legal to buy and sell cigarettes, they should not be fired for being a smoker, while the employer can set limits to how often and where smokers go for a smoke break.water cooler benefits
I'd say yes, especially if the worker in query cigarette smoking in the position of perform or near to it. Not everyone can take a position even a whiff of cigarettes. Still, Tom's right, reasonable alerts should still be given and maybe even a recommendation to try better and less troublesome solutions.
Don't look upon this new activity as a way to preserve a lot of cash, as composing your own edition of most of the applications that you need to pay for now will be out of your achieve.
15 Comments to “Fired for smoking!?!”
January 24, 2013 at 2:39 PM
In my world I would say yes that employers should be allowed to fire somebody because they smoke! I can't stand the stench of cigarettes and cigars, etc. In this politically correct state-of-being that we are in, no, they should not be allowed to fire somebody because they smoke. Maybe full-time employment could be based on a short physical for possible insurance and then the employer could base their decision to hire on the outcome of that physical. As for part-time….I don't know…STOP SMOKING!
January 24, 2013 at 5:26 PM
As long as it's still legal to buy and sell cigarettes, they should not be fired for being a smoker, while the employer can set limits to how often and where smokers go for a smoke break. Firing a smoker would be the same as firing a drinker. Yes it's best to be a none smoker, but thats in a perfect world.
January 25, 2013 at 9:13 AM
I would hope to be given an opportunity to quit smoking first, but an employer should have the right to fire for any reason and keep your govt. out of it. If your competition hires the better talent, including smokers, you may suffer. The smokers should have the right to open a smokers only work force.
April 1, 2013 at 1:38 AM
I'd say yes, especially if the employee in question smokes in the work place or close to it. Not everyone can stand even a whiff of tobacco. Still, Tom's right, fair warnings should still be given and maybe even a suggestion to try healthier and less disruptive alternatives.
April 3, 2013 at 4:37 AM
They typically ask about your previous work experience; strengths and weaknesses; what makes you interested in the position
April 8, 2013 at 1:03 PM
Nice article Regis. I think that Faith is similar to Hope. I'm testing Hope right now, so this article really help me pass through this.
April 14, 2013 at 9:22 AM
I have a theme that is responsive but the content appears uneven within its page container so that it appears aligned left. I want to make sure that it is always centered no matter the screen size; and I was wondering if I could and how to convert it to being fixed or correct the issue.
April 17, 2013 at 4:48 AM
Don't look upon this new hobby as a way to save yourself a lot of money, as writing your own version of most of the programs that you need to pay for now will be out of your reach.
May 2, 2013 at 11:13 AM
Ahaa, its fastidious discussion regarding this paragraph here at this website, I
have read all that, so now me also commenting here.
May 3, 2013 at 11:48 AM
Nice article Regis. I think that Faith is similar to Hope. I'm testing Hope right now, so this article really help me pass through this.
v2 cigs electronic cigarette
May 7, 2013 at 5:28 AM
As long as it's still legal to buy and sell cigarettes, they should not be fired for being a smoker, while the employer can set limits to how often and where smokers go for a smoke break.water cooler benefits
May 10, 2013 at 1:12 PM
Nice article Regis. I think that Faith is similar to Hope. I'm testing Hope right now, so this article really help me pass through this.
May 14, 2013 at 11:52 PM
this link is very informative…
May 16, 2013 at 3:33 AM
I'd say yes, especially if the worker in query cigarette smoking in the position of perform or near to it. Not everyone can take a position even a whiff of cigarettes. Still, Tom's right, reasonable alerts should still be given and maybe even a recommendation to try better and less troublesome solutions.
May 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Don't look upon this new activity as a way to preserve a lot of cash, as composing your own edition of most of the applications that you need to pay for now will be out of your achieve.